Political Disillusionment in France Rooted in Elite Disconnect, Not Citizen Fatigue

A comprehensive analysis from the collective work "French Democracy in Distress," directed by Nonna Mayer and Frédéric Gonthier, challenges the widespread notion of democratic fatigue among French citizens. The book argues that the core issue in France's democratic crisis stems not from citizens' weariness but from political elites narrowing opportunities for participation and public deliberation.

Despite about 90% of the French population affirming their belief in democracy as the best political system, around 80% reportedly feel underrepresented and view democratic institutions as ineffective. This disconnect signals frustration with political leaders perceived as inaccessible and unresponsive, especially amid recent crises like the pandemic and social movements such as the Gilets Jaunes.

Mayer and Gonthier emphasize that "democratic fatigue" originates from strategies adopted by elites that bypass citizen involvement, including unilateral decision-making. Contrary to popular belief, the rise of populism is framed not as rejection but rather a demand for enhanced accountability and inclusion within democratic processes.

The work highlights a social dimension to this malaise: economically and socially marginalized groups express more pronounced feelings of neglect by institutions. Additionally, the book situates France’s democratic challenges within a global pattern of gradual democratic erosion characterized by restricted rights and weakened checks and balances.

In conclusion, the authors call for a democratic renewal grounded in social inclusiveness and authentic citizen engagement, advocating efforts to address systemic inequalities. They remain cautiously optimistic, pointing to continued grassroots activism and a persistent attachment to democratic ideals among the populace.

This analysis contextualizes France’s political discontent as not a crisis of democracy’s value but as an urgent call for better representation and responsiveness in governance.