Les Républicains Face Deepening Rift Over Government Participation
Les Républicains face internal collapse as members joining Lecornu's government risk exclusion, amid political and scandal controversies.
- • Six LR members joined the government against party directives, risking exclusion.
- • Bruno Retailleau's leadership confirmed exclusions including Rachida Dati and Annie Genevard.
- • Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu addressed pension reform and government budget amid party tensions.
- • Vincent Jeanbrun faces investigation for favoritism in social housing allocation.
Key details
On October 13, 2025, the Les Républicains (LR) party is embroiled in a severe internal crisis as six of its members have joined the government of Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu, directly defying the party's directive to avoid full government participation and limit support to text-by-text collaboration. This breach has led the LR leadership, under Bruno Retailleau, to announce the forthcoming exclusion of those members, including notable figures such as Rachida Dati, the party's candidate for the Paris mayoralty, Annie Genevard, and Philippe Tabarot. Retailleau's entourage has warned that these members who choose to align with the government risk expulsion, effectively severing ties with LR. This development follows a tense weekend of meetings, highlighting the threat of internal collapse within the party. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Lecornu, in an interview addressing pension reform and the government budget, remarked on the seriousness of ongoing political negotiations, and noted the departure of ministers such as Yannick Neuder, who refused to stay in the government due to the political turmoil. Furthermore, members from LR who accepted government roles can no longer claim affiliation with the party following an internal vote supporting right-wing participation without direct government involvement. Adding to the political tensions, Vincent Jeanbrun, the new Minister of Housing, is under scrutiny for an ongoing investigation into allegations of favoritism in the distribution of social housing, further complicating the government's public image and internal stability.