Public Opposition Intensifies as Duplomb Law Faces National Debate
A petition against the Duplomb law garners 1.5 million signatures, prompting potential parliamentary debate amid rising tensions in France.
Key Points
- • Petition against Duplomb law collects over 1.5 million signatures, enabling National Assembly debate.
- • Laurent Duplomb accuses opponents of using fear tactics to drive petition support.
- • Geoffroy Didier argues the law is crucial for French agricultural competitiveness.
- • Nine attacks against parliamentarians reported, leading to calls for increased security.
The controversy surrounding the Duplomb law, aimed at regulating agricultural practices in France, is escalating as a petition against the law has gathered over 1.5 million signatures. This monumental public response sets the stage for a potential debate in the National Assembly, an outcome that highlights the growing dissent among the French populace regarding agricultural policies.
Laurent Duplomb, the law's author and a senator from the Republicans, attributed the petition's overwhelming success to what he described as fear-mongering tactics employed by opponents. "When one demonizes and frightens people, one can only expect this result," he stated, underscoring his view that the opposition's campaign is misleading. Conversely, supporters like Geoffroy Didier, the vice-president of the Republicans, argue that the law is essential for keeping French agriculture competitive within Europe, highlighting the need to adopt agricultural practices aligned with those in other European nations.
On the other hand, ecologist MP Sandrine Rousseau vehemently opposes the law, maintaining that France should not replicate the agricultural missteps of its neighbors and instead pursue independent progress. The political atmosphere has been charged, exacerbated by incidents of violence against parliamentarians. The Ministry of the Interior reported nine attacks, including threats and vandalism, which prompted calls for protective measures and legal actions against those responsible. In response, the office of Gérald Darmanin announced intentions to enhance security for threatened officials.
Recognizing the public's discontent, Gabriel Attal, secretary general of the Renaissance party, has backed the idea of having a parliamentary debate on the petition. Ultimately, the decision on whether to schedule a debate will be made by the Assembly's conference of presidents during the forthcoming parliamentary session set for October, as the legislative process continues amidst this heated public opposition and political tension.