Union Calédonienne Rejects Bougival Agreement, Sparking Political Tensions
The Union Calédonienne has officially rejected the Bougival agreement, escalating tensions in New Caledonia's political scene.
Key Points
- • Union Calédonienne unanimously rejected the Bougival agreement on July 27.
- • Rejection may lead to withdrawal of mandates from deputies involved.
- • Contentions revolve around electoral roll changes and referendum results recognition.
- • Union Progressiste en Mélanésie supports the agreement as a balanced compromise.
In a pivotal meeting held on July 27, the Union Calédonienne (UC) unanimously rejected the Bougival agreement, raising significant political implications within New Caledonia's independence movements. The rejection was described as an outright "rejet en bloc" and may lead to the withdrawal of mandates from signatory deputies including Emmanuel Tjibaou, Mickaël Forrest, and Roch Wamytan, potentially resulting in disciplinary actions against them.
Key points of contention surrounding the Bougival agreement include proposed modifications to the electoral roll and the handling of results from the third referendum, which the independence electorate largely ignored due to health crises. In contrast, the Union Progressiste en Mélanésie (UPM), led by President Victor Tutugoro, has expressed support for the agreement, labeling it a "balanced political compromise". The UPM is gearing up to engage with grassroots efforts to communicate the nuances of the agreement to their constituents.
Meanwhile, the Rassemblement Démocratique Océanien (RDO) reaffirmed its support for President Aloïsio Sako and aims to clarify the agreement's details to its members, despite initial skepticism. In a future development, a plenary meeting of the FLNKS is scheduled for August 2, where strategies regarding the Bougival agreement will be discussed. These moves reflect the multifaceted dynamics and conflicts within New Caledonia's political landscape regarding independence and governance.