Duplomb Law Controversy Intensifies as Constitutional Council Decision Looms

The controversy surrounding the Duplomb law is escalating as the Conseil constitutionnel prepares to rule on its constitutionality by August 11, with expectations for a decision as early as August 7. This contentious legislation, which seeks to relax environmental and health regulations for farmers, has mobilized an unprecedented public response, amassing over two million signatures on a petition opposing it—marking a historic wave of dissent in the Fifth Republic.

The law is centered around provisions such as the reintroduction of the pesticide acetamipride, a substance banned since 2018 due to its detrimental effects on the environment, particularly on pollinators like bees. Proponents of the law argue that easing regulations is essential for enhancing the competitiveness of French agriculture. However, opponents maintain that the law contradicts the Charter of the Environment, which enshrines the right to a balanced and healthy environment for citizens.

Legal experts and environmental advocates are urging the Conseil constitutionnel to consider the principle of 'non-regression'—a legal standard mandating that environmental protections cannot be rolled back. This principle, along with concerns related to public health risks from pesticides, has emerged as a critical argument against the Duplomb law. Medical professionals warn that exposure to substances like acetamipride is linked to serious health risks, including cancers and neurological disorders, and they advocate for the precautionary principles outlined in the Charter.

The expedited passage of the law has also drawn severe criticism from opposition members, who label it a 'democratic denial.' They argue that the discussions and debates were significantly curtailed in the National Assembly, preventing a thorough examination of the law's implications. While it remains uncertain whether the Conseil constitutionnel will focus on these political critiques, there is hope that the body will confront the constitutional challenges highlighted by the public petition.

As the deadline for the Consejo constitutionnel's decision approaches, the outcome is keenly anticipated, with significant implications for France's environmental policies and public health standards hanging in the balance.