Marine Le Pen Denies Wrongdoing at Start of Appeal Trial in European Parliament Assistants Case
Marine Le Pen denies wrongdoing in the appeal trial over European Parliament assistants accused of serving National Rally's interests, risking her eligibility for the 2027 presidential election.
- • Marine Le Pen denies any wrongdoing related to parliamentary assistants funded by the European Parliament.
- • She blames the European Parliament for not alerting her about irregularities in contracts from 2004 to 2014.
- • The appeal trial involves eleven defendants and will run until February 11, 2026.
- • Le Pen’s previous conviction includes a five-year ineligibility sentence, which could bar her from the 2027 presidential race, with replacement potential by Jordan Bardella.
Key details
On January 13, 2026, Marine Le Pen faced the appeal trial in Paris concerning accusations that parliamentary assistants, allegedly funded by the European Parliament, were deployed to serve interests of the National Rally party (RN) rather than their official roles. Le Pen, former president of the RN, asserted she did not believe she had committed any offense throughout her testimony. She highlighted that she never intended any wrongdoing and pointed to the European Parliament's failure to alert her about potential irregularities related to the assistants' contracts from 2004 to 2014.
This legal battle involves eleven defendants and the RN party itself as a legal entity, with proceedings expected to run until February 11, 2026. Previously, Le Pen was sentenced to five years of ineligibility, barring her from running in the 2027 presidential election, along with a four-year prison term (two years to be served under electronic monitoring) and a €100,000 fine. The appeal trial represents a pivotal moment for her political future, as upholding the conviction could lead to her replacement by Jordan Bardella as the RN's presidential candidate.
In addition to denying personal culpability, Le Pen suggested during the hearing that she might adjust her defense strategy, indicating she could accept the possibility that offenses were committed without her knowledge. This nuanced stance reflects the complex legal and political ramifications of the case.
The trial highlights significant tensions between Le Pen, the RN, and European institutions over the use of parliamentary funds and party activities. The verdict will bear heavily on French politics ahead of the 2027 elections, determining Le Pen's eligibility and the RN's candidate lineup moving forward.
This article was translated and synthesized from French sources, providing English-speaking readers with local perspectives.
Source articles (2)
Source comparison
Le Pen's defense strategy
Sources report conflicting defense strategies from Marine Le Pen
lemonde.fr
"Marine Le Pen asserted that she did not feel she had committed any offense related to the employment of her parliamentary assistants."
liberation.fr
"Le Pen hinted at a potential change in her defense strategy, considering that a crime may have been committed without her knowledge."
Why this matters: One source states Le Pen asserted she committed no offense, while the other suggests she may acknowledge a crime occurred without her knowledge. This discrepancy is significant as it indicates a potential shift in her legal approach, affecting how the case may unfold.
Latest news
French Ice Dancers Cizeron and Fournier Beaudry Take Lead with Rhythm Dance Win at 2026 Winter Olympics
Bourgogne-Franche-Comté Faces Economic Strain in 2025 Amid Rising Business Failures
La France Insoumise at 10: Navigating Decline and Controversy Ahead of 2027
Socialist Party Unveils Strategy to Lead Left in 2026 Municipal Elections Ahead of 2027 Presidential Race
François Villeroy de Galhau Resigns as Governor of the Bank of France Ahead of 2027 Election
Jean-Marc Morandini Withdraws from CNews Following Conviction Controversy
The top news stories in France
Delivered straight to your inbox each morning.