Paris Nurse Suspended for Eight Months Over Surgical Cap Dress Code Dispute

A Paris nurse suspended for eight months over wearing a surgical cap at work challenges workplace dress codes and personal expression rights.

    Key details

  • • Nurse Madjouline B. was fired for wearing a surgical cap against hospital dress code.
  • • The Paris administrative court ruled the firing disproportionate and ordered reinstatement.
  • • AP-HP replaced reinstatement with an eight-month suspension instead.
  • • The case raises issues of personal expression vs. institutional policy in the workplace.

Madjouline B., a nurse at the Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital in Paris, was initially dismissed on November 10, 2025, for repeatedly wearing a surgical cap (calot) at work, which the Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) deemed inappropriate. She challenged the dismissal, leading the Paris administrative tribunal to rule in early January 2026 that while her wearing the cap warranted disciplinary action, her firing was a disproportionate penalty and ordered her reinstatement within one month.

However, AP-HP did not comply with the reinstatement order and instead modified the sanction to an eight-month suspension. This decision prompted dissatisfaction from Madjouline’s legal counsel and staff representatives. Her lawyer clarified that Madjouline never claimed any religious basis for wearing the cap but considered it a personal choice related to her private life.

The nurse, who has worked since 2018, and the tribunal’s ruling have highlighted the ongoing tension between workplace dress codes and individual rights to personal expression within professional settings. Blandine Chauvel, a staff representative, expressed concern over AP-HP’s refusal to abide by the court’s reinstatement order.

This case raises important questions about how institutions balance policy enforcement with respect for personal freedoms in the workplace, especially in sensitive environments such as hospitals.

This article was translated and synthesized from French sources, providing English-speaking readers with local perspectives.

Source comparison

Name of the nurse

Sources report different names for the nurse involved in the case

lefigaro.fr

"Madjouline B., an infirmière at the Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)..."

lemonde.fr

"Majdouline B., a nurse at the Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital in Paris..."

Why this matters: One source refers to her as 'Madjouline B.' while the other uses 'Majdouline B.' This discrepancy in the name could lead to confusion about the individual involved in the case.

Hospital name

Sources report different hospital names where the nurse worked

lefigaro.fr

"...at the Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)..."

lemonde.fr

"...at the Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital in Paris..."

Why this matters: One source states she worked at the Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), while the other specifies the Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital. This could affect the context of the case regarding institutional policies.

The top news stories in France

Delivered straight to your inbox each morning.